Divorce can bring emotional upheaval, especially when it comes to questions of who gets to stay in the family home. This is often one of the most valuable and emotionally significant assets a couple shares, and deciding who lives there after separation or divorce can become a major point of contention. Whether you’re legally married or in a civil partnership, understanding your rights can help you make informed decisions about your future living arrangements.
Legal ownership vs occupation rights
One of the first issues to clarify is who owns the family home. If the property is in joint names, both spouses have an equal right to live there—this is known as the “right of occupation.” Even if the home is in the sole name of one spouse, the other spouse may still have the right to remain in the property because of “home rights”. These give a non-owning spouse the legal entitlement to stay in the marital home until the divorce is finalised, unless a court orders otherwise.
You can register your home rights with the Land Registry if you’re not a legal owner but are married to or in a civil partnership with the owner. This prevents the property from being sold or mortgaged without your knowledge and can offer some security while financial matters are being resolved.
Can my spouse force me to leave the home?
In general, one spouse cannot force the other to leave the family home simply because the relationship has broken down. If both parties have a legal right to live in the property, one cannot evict the other without a court order. This applies to both owned and rented properties.
However, there are some exceptions. If there is domestic abuse or threats of harm, the victim may apply for an occupation order—a court order that requires the abusive partner to leave the home, even if they are the legal owner. But in the absence of such circumstances, neither party can unilaterally remove the other from the property.
What happens after the divorce?
When a divorce is finalised, the legal right to remain in the home may change, depending on the financial settlement reached. The division of assets, including the home, is dealt with during the financial proceedings. The court can decide who keeps the home, whether it should be sold, or if one party should stay temporarily or permanently.
In most cases, the family home is treated as a matrimonial asset, regardless of whose name is on the title. The court’s priority is achieving a fair outcome based on a variety of factors, including:
- The length of the marriage
- The financial needs and resources of each party
- The standard of living during the marriage
- Each party’s contribution (both financial and non-financial)
It is worth noting that when children are involved, the court will place their welfare above all else. This often means that the parent who is the primary carer for the children may be allowed to remain in the family home, at least until the children are grown. This arrangement may be formalised through a Mesher order, which postpones the sale of the house until a specified trigger event—typically when the youngest child turns 18 or finishes full-time education.
What if there are no children?
In child-free divorces, the court will focus more strictly on the financial circumstances and needs of each spouse. If one party wants to remain in the home, they will need to demonstrate why this is appropriate or necessary.
Arguments for staying might include:
- Lack of financial resources to purchase or rent alternative accommodation
- Health issues or disability that make moving particularly difficult
- Contributions to the home (such as renovations or mortgage payments)
- A significantly lower earning capacity
The other spouse may argue that the home should be sold to achieve a clean break or to free up capital that can be divided between both parties.
Can my ex force me to sell the home?
The court can order the sale of the home if it considers that neither party has a stronger right to remain than the other, or if selling is necessary to divide the assets fairly. This might occur in situations where:
- Both spouses are financially independent and there are no children
- One party needs their share of the equity to buy another home
- Keeping the home is not affordable for either spouse alone
If the court orders the sale of the home, the proceeds will be divided according to what it deems to be a fair settlement. In practice, this does not always mean an equal split. For example, a spouse with fewer financial resources might receive a larger share of the proceeds to enable them to rehouse.
There are some scenarios in which one party might remain in the family home while the other receives a larger share of other matrimonial assets—such as pensions, savings, or investments. This is often done to allow one spouse to remain in the home without requiring ongoing financial support.
Another possibility is that one spouse may buy out the other’s interest in the home, allowing them to remain as the sole owner. This option requires the financial means to refinance or pay a lump sum, and the cooperation of both parties.
Practical considerations
It is essential to take early legal advice when navigating post-divorce housing rights. A solicitor can help you:
- Register your home rights if you’re not a legal owner
- Apply for occupation orders in urgent cases
- Negotiate a financial settlement that includes fair housing arrangements
- Protect your interests during property sales or buyouts
Additionally, always consider the financial practicality of staying in the home. Mortgage payments, maintenance costs, and utility bills can be burdensome, especially on a single income.
Whether you want to stay in the home, buy out your spouse, or seek a new start elsewhere, understanding your legal position is key. Divorce can be complex, but with the right guidance, you can secure a fair and workable outcome for your living arrangements.
Related Articles
Load More